Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCOZX vs FRORX
FCOZX vs FRORX Comparison
Open Charts FCOZX vs FRORX
FCOZX vs FRORX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOZX vs. FRORX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOZX is a Hold and FRORX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRORX has more cash in the bank: 817M vs. FCOZX (487M). FRORX (3.51) and FCOZX (3.41) have matching dividends . FCOZX was incepted earlier than FRORX: FCOZX (17 years) vs FRORX (39 years). FRORX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FCOZX (0.60). FRORX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.43 vs. FCOZX (11.43). FRORX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCOZX: FRORX (1000) vs FCOZX (100000). FCOZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.69 vs. FRORX (7.30). FCOZX return over 5 years is better than : 1.29 vs. FRORX (-0.26).
| FCOZX | FRORX | FCOZX / FRORX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.66 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.66 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.410 | 2.286 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 487M | 817M | 60% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 3.51 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.69 | 7.30 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.07 | 11.64 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.29 | -0.26 | -496% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.78 | 1.95 | 194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers