Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCOZX vs MSNCX
FCOZX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FCOZX vs MSNCX
FCOZX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOZX vs. MSNCX commentary
Jun 08, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOZX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSNCX has more cash in the bank: 569M vs. FCOZX (486M). FCOZX (3.41) and MSNCX (3.29) have matching dividends . FCOZX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FCOZX (17 years) vs MSNCX (42 years). MSNCX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FCOZX (0.60). MSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FCOZX (11.43). MSNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCOZX: MSNCX (1000) vs FCOZX (100000). FCOZX (7.91) and MSNCX (7.56) have marching annual gain over last year. MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.13 vs. FCOZX (0.84).
| FCOZX | MSNCX | FCOZX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.84 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.86 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.833 | 1.938 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 486M | 569M | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 3.29 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.91 | 7.56 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.06 | 11.44 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.84 | 3.13 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.39 | 15.54 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers