Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCPGX vs NRGSX
FCPGX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts FCPGX vs NRGSX
FCPGX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCPGX vs. NRGSX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCPGX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCPGX has more cash in the bank: 8.92B vs. NRGSX (7.17B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than FCPGX: NRGSX (0.44) vs FCPGX (0.00). FCPGX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: FCPGX (22 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). FCPGX (0.88) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). FCPGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). FCPGX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.41 vs. NRGSX (-3.84). FCPGX return over 5 years is better than : 6.19 vs. NRGSX (-23.18).
| FCPGX | NRGSX | FCPGX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.74 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.74 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.795 | 13.863 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.92B | 7.17B | 124% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.41 | -3.84 | -584% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.15 | 0.84 | 7,161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.19 | -23.18 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.67 | 8.75 | 1,254% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers