Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCPGX vs NRGSX
FCPGX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts FCPGX vs NRGSX
FCPGX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCPGX vs. NRGSX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCPGX is a Buy and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCPGX has more cash in the bank: 9.39B vs. NRGSX (7.44B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than FCPGX: NRGSX (0.44) vs FCPGX (0.00). FCPGX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: FCPGX (22 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). FCPGX (0.88) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). FCPGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). FCPGX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.24 vs. NRGSX (-6.26). FCPGX return over 5 years is better than : 16.40 vs. NRGSX (-21.78).
| FCPGX | NRGSX | FCPGX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.74 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.74 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.625 | 11.183 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.39B | 7.44B | 126% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.24 | -6.26 | -403% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.17 | -3.29 | -1,830% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.40 | -21.78 | -75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.08 | 10.83 | 1,099% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers