Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCPIX vs RERCX
FCPIX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts FCPIX vs RERCX
FCPIX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCPIX vs. RERCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCPIX is a Hold and RERCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 141B vs. FCPIX (18.5B). RERCX pays higher dividends than FCPIX: RERCX (2.43) vs FCPIX (0.49). FCPIX was incepted earlier than RERCX: FCPIX (29 years) vs RERCX (24 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FCPIX (0.89). FCPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RERCX (50.00). FCPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERCX: FCPIX (0) vs RERCX (250). FCPIX (4.83) and RERCX (4.75) have marching annual gain over last year. FCPIX return over 5 years is better than : 26.13 vs. RERCX (-7.66).
| FCPIX | RERCX | FCPIX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.12 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.12 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.164 | 2.207 | 415% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.5B | 141B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 2.43 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.83 | 4.75 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.86 | 14.97 | 280% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.13 | -7.66 | -341% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.74 | 41.85 | 336% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement