Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCPIX vs RERCX
FCPIX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts FCPIX vs RERCX
FCPIX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCPIX vs. RERCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCPIX is a Hold and RERCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. FCPIX (16.6B). RERCX pays higher dividends than FCPIX: RERCX (2.37) vs FCPIX (0.51). FCPIX was incepted earlier than RERCX: FCPIX (29 years) vs RERCX (24 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FCPIX (0.89). FCPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RERCX (50.00). FCPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERCX: FCPIX (0) vs RERCX (250). FCPIX (13.69) and RERCX (13.33) have marching annual gain over last year. FCPIX return over 5 years is better than : 33.40 vs. RERCX (-3.91).
| FCPIX | RERCX | FCPIX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.12 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.12 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.955 | 6.672 | 209% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.6B | 143B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 2.37 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.69 | 13.33 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.73 | 25.06 | 214% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.40 | -3.91 | -855% |
| Returns for 10 years | 162.73 | 58.14 | 280% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement