Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCQAX vs MSCCX
FCQAX vs MSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FCQAX vs MSCCX
FCQAX vs MSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCQAX vs. MSCCX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCQAX is a Hold and MSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCQAX has more cash in the bank: 3.3B vs. MSCCX (1.32B). FCQAX pays higher dividends than MSCCX: FCQAX (4.16) vs MSCCX (3.03). FCQAX was incepted earlier than MSCCX: FCQAX (8 years) vs MSCCX (13 years). MSCCX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FCQAX (0.80). MSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FCQAX (13.89). FCQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSCCX: FCQAX (1000) vs MSCCX (2500). FCQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.27 vs. MSCCX (6.31). MSCCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.17 vs. FCQAX (-1.69).
| FCQAX | MSCCX | FCQAX / MSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.03 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.04 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.946 | 1.466 | 133% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.3B | 1.32B | 250% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.16 | 3.03 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.27 | 6.31 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.94 | 10.67 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.69 | 0.17 | -990% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 15.77 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement