Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCQAX vs MSCCX
FCQAX vs MSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FCQAX vs MSCCX
FCQAX vs MSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCQAX vs. MSCCX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCQAX is a Hold and MSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCQAX has more cash in the bank: 3.28B vs. MSCCX (1.28B). FCQAX pays higher dividends than MSCCX: FCQAX (4.25) vs MSCCX (3.08). FCQAX was incepted earlier than MSCCX: FCQAX (8 years) vs MSCCX (14 years). MSCCX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FCQAX (0.81). MSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FCQAX (13.89). FCQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSCCX: FCQAX (1000) vs MSCCX (2500). FCQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.72 vs. MSCCX (3.63). MSCCX return over 5 years is better than : -1.66 vs. FCQAX (-3.76).
| FCQAX | MSCCX | FCQAX / MSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.03 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.04 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.181 | -0.395 | -46% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.28B | 1.28B | 256% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.25 | 3.08 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.72 | 3.63 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.61 | 9.00 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.76 | -1.66 | 227% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers