Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCQAX vs MSCVX
FCQAX vs MSCVX Comparison
Open Charts FCQAX vs MSCVX
FCQAX vs MSCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCQAX vs. MSCVX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCQAX is a Hold and MSCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCQAX has more cash in the bank: 3.3B vs. MSCVX (1.32B). FCQAX pays higher dividends than MSCVX: FCQAX (4.16) vs MSCVX (3.28). FCQAX was incepted earlier than MSCVX: FCQAX (8 years) vs MSCVX (13 years). FCQAX (0.80) and MSCVX (0.79) have similar cost to investors . MSCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FCQAX (13.89). FCQAX initial investment is less costly to investors than MSCVX (3%) vs MSCVX (3%). FCQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSCVX: FCQAX (1000) vs MSCVX (2500). FCQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.27 vs. MSCVX (6.58). MSCVX return over 5 years is better than : 1.44 vs. FCQAX (-1.69).
| FCQAX | MSCVX | FCQAX / MSCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.78 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.79 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.946 | 1.572 | 124% |
| Front Load | 4% | 3% | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.3B | 1.32B | 250% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.16 | 3.28 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.27 | 6.58 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.94 | 11.51 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.69 | 1.44 | -117% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers