Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSDX vs TMAAX
FCSDX vs TMAAX Comparison
Open Charts FCSDX vs TMAAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc C
Price$17.30
Change-$0.15 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.21B
Thrivent Moderately Agrsv Allocation A
Price$18.07
Change-$0.12 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.06B
FCSDX vs TMAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSDX vs. TMAAX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSDX is a Buy and TMAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSDX (5.21B) and TMAAX (5.07B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . TMAAX pays higher dividends than FCSDX: TMAAX (1.79) vs FCSDX (1.44). FCSDX was incepted earlier than TMAAX: FCSDX (22 years) vs TMAAX (20 years). FCSDX (1.67) is less costly to investors than TMAAX (1.35). TMAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FCSDX (36.00). FCSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAAX: FCSDX (0) vs TMAAX (2000). FCSDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.81 vs. TMAAX (3.88). TMAAX (29.65) and FCSDX (29.12) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCSDX | TMAAX | FCSDX / TMAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.12 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.35 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.643 | 6.107 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.21B | 5.07B | 103% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.79 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.81 | 3.88 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.24 | 30.91 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.12 | 29.65 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.62 | 42.41 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers