Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSDX vs TMAAX
FCSDX vs TMAAX Comparison
Open Charts FCSDX vs TMAAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc C
Price$17.99
Change-$0.03 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.3B
Thrivent Moderately Agrsv Allocation A
Price$19.03
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.27B
FCSDX vs TMAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSDX vs. TMAAX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSDX is a Hold and TMAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSDX (5.3B) and TMAAX (5.27B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . TMAAX pays higher dividends than FCSDX: TMAAX (1.74) vs FCSDX (1.42). FCSDX was incepted earlier than TMAAX: FCSDX (22 years) vs TMAAX (20 years). FCSDX (1.67) is less costly to investors than TMAAX (1.35). TMAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FCSDX (36.00). FCSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAAX: FCSDX (0) vs TMAAX (2000). TMAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.18 vs. FCSDX (4.16). TMAAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.23 vs. FCSDX (28.67).
| FCSDX | TMAAX | FCSDX / TMAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.12 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.35 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.094 | 11.744 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.3B | 5.27B | 101% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.74 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.16 | 8.18 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.82 | 36.73 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.67 | 31.23 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.56 | 59.86 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers