Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSDX vs TMAAX
FCSDX vs TMAAX Comparison
Open Charts FCSDX vs TMAAX
FCSDX vs TMAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSDX vs. TMAAX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSDX is a Hold and TMAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSDX (5.76B) and TMAAX (5.76B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCSDX pays higher dividends than TMAAX: FCSDX (1.26) vs TMAAX (1.10). FCSDX was incepted earlier than TMAAX: FCSDX (23 years) vs TMAAX (21 years). FCSDX (1.67) is less costly to investors than TMAAX (1.36). TMAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FCSDX (41.00). FCSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAAX: FCSDX (0) vs TMAAX (2000). FCSDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.15 vs. TMAAX (6.66). TMAAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.01 vs. FCSDX (15.62).
| FCSDX | TMAAX | FCSDX / TMAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.13 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.36 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.041 | 9.464 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.76B | 5.76B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.10 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | 6.66 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.81 | 35.30 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.62 | 17.01 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.24 | 69.99 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement