Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSDX vs TMAAX
FCSDX vs TMAAX Comparison
Open Charts FCSDX vs TMAAX
FCSDX vs TMAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSDX vs. TMAAX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSDX is a Hold and TMAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMAAX (5.81B) and FCSDX (5.76B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCSDX pays higher dividends than TMAAX: FCSDX (1.41) vs TMAAX (1.12). FCSDX was incepted earlier than TMAAX: FCSDX (23 years) vs TMAAX (21 years). FCSDX (1.67) is less costly to investors than TMAAX (1.36). TMAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FCSDX (41.00). FCSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAAX: FCSDX (0) vs TMAAX (2000). FCSDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.20 vs. TMAAX (14.97). TMAAX return over 5 years is better than : 21.59 vs. FCSDX (20.22).
| FCSDX | TMAAX | FCSDX / TMAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.13 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.36 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.320 | 8.862 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.76B | 5.81B | 99% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 1.12 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.20 | 14.97 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.65 | 30.61 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.22 | 21.59 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.89 | 74.51 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers