Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSGX vs WCMLX
FCSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FCSGX vs WCMLX
FCSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSGX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSGX has more cash in the bank: 2.57B vs. WCMLX (51.9M). FCSGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FCSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FCSGX (26 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). FCSGX (1.79) and WCMLX (1.79) have similar cost to investors . WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FCSGX (48.01). FCSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FCSGX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.02 vs. FCSGX (14.18). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 3.16 vs. FCSGX (-18.96).
| FCSGX | WCMLX | FCSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.99 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.79 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.253 | 11.410 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.57B | 51.9M | 4,948% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.18 | 17.02 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.15 | 32.50 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.96 | 3.16 | -599% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers