Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSGX vs WCMLX
FCSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FCSGX vs WCMLX
FCSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSGX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSGX has more cash in the bank: 2.36B vs. WCMLX (47.2M). FCSGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FCSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FCSGX (26 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). FCSGX (1.82) and WCMLX (1.79) have similar cost to investors . WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FCSGX (48.01). FCSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FCSGX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.81 vs. FCSGX (1.96). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. FCSGX (-26.45).
| FCSGX | WCMLX | FCSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.99 | 184% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.79 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.328 | 3.852 | 216% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.36B | 47.2M | 4,998% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.96 | 2.81 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.83 | 23.40 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.45 | -7.51 | 352% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement