Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSGX vs WCMNX
FCSGX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FCSGX vs WCMNX
FCSGX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSGX vs. WCMNX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSGX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSGX has more cash in the bank: 2.36B vs. WCMNX (47.2M). FCSGX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . FCSGX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: FCSGX (26 years) vs WCMNX (7 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FCSGX (1.82). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FCSGX (48.01). FCSGX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.55 vs. FCSGX (1.96). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -8.65 vs. FCSGX (-26.45).
| FCSGX | WCMNX | FCSGX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.24 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 2.04 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.328 | 3.690 | 226% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.36B | 47.2M | 4,998% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.96 | 2.55 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.83 | 22.49 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.45 | -8.65 | 306% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers