Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSGX vs WCMNX
FCSGX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FCSGX vs WCMNX
FCSGX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSGX vs. WCMNX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSGX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSGX has more cash in the bank: 2.57B vs. WCMNX (51.9M). FCSGX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . FCSGX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: FCSGX (26 years) vs WCMNX (7 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FCSGX (1.79). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FCSGX (48.01). FCSGX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.65 vs. FCSGX (14.18). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 1.76 vs. FCSGX (-18.96).
| FCSGX | WCMNX | FCSGX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.24 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 2.04 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.253 | 11.144 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.57B | 51.9M | 4,948% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.18 | 16.65 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.15 | 31.41 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.96 | 1.76 | -1,079% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers