Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSKX vs NCIAX
FCSKX vs NCIAX Comparison
Open Charts FCSKX vs NCIAX
Franklin Convertible Securities R6
Price$24.86
Change+$0.10 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.93B
Columbia Convertible Securities Inst
Price$24.32
Change+$0.17 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.19B
FCSKX vs NCIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSKX vs. NCIAX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSKX is a Hold and NCIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSKX has more cash in the bank: 2.93B vs. NCIAX (1.19B). NCIAX pays higher dividends than FCSKX: NCIAX (1.96) vs FCSKX (1.59). FCSKX was incepted earlier than NCIAX: FCSKX (12 years) vs NCIAX (26 years). NCIAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FCSKX (0.52). NCIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. FCSKX (37.31). NCIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCSKX: NCIAX (2000) vs FCSKX (1000000). NCIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.29 vs. FCSKX (15.34). NCIAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.80 vs. FCSKX (-1.33).
| FCSKX | NCIAX | FCSKX / NCIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.83 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.90 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.509 | 12.781 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.93B | 1.19B | 247% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.96 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.34 | 19.29 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.73 | 33.68 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.33 | 2.80 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.45 | 68.64 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement