Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSKX vs NCIAX
FCSKX vs NCIAX Comparison
Open Charts FCSKX vs NCIAX
Franklin Convertible Securities R6
Price$24.34
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.87B
Columbia Convertible Securities Inst
Price$23.61
Change+$0.06 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.17B
FCSKX vs NCIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSKX vs. NCIAX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSKX is a Sell and NCIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSKX has more cash in the bank: 2.87B vs. NCIAX (1.17B). NCIAX pays higher dividends than FCSKX: NCIAX (2.00) vs FCSKX (1.61). FCSKX was incepted earlier than NCIAX: FCSKX (11 years) vs NCIAX (26 years). NCIAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FCSKX (0.52). NCIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. FCSKX (37.31). NCIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCSKX: NCIAX (2000) vs FCSKX (1000000). NCIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.30 vs. FCSKX (15.80). NCIAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.45 vs. FCSKX (-4.74).
| FCSKX | NCIAX | FCSKX / NCIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.83 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.90 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.386 | 9.211 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.87B | 1.17B | 246% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.61 | 2.00 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.80 | 19.30 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.36 | 25.66 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.74 | 2.45 | -194% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.85 | 58.66 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers