Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSRX vs HBLCX
FCSRX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FCSRX vs HBLCX
FCSRX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSRX vs. HBLCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSRX is a StrongBuy and HBLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. FCSRX (592M). FCSRX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: FCSRX (3.28) vs HBLCX (2.49). FCSRX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FCSRX (21 years) vs HBLCX (20 years). FCSRX (1.78) is less costly to investors than HBLCX (1.65). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FCSRX (29.00). FCSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FCSRX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FCSRX: HBLCX (2000) vs FCSRX (500). FCSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.08 vs. HBLCX (5.80). FCSRX return over 5 years is better than : 28.97 vs. HBLCX (1.37).
| FCSRX | HBLCX | FCSRX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.65 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.65 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.937 | 3.107 | 255% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 592M | 11.2B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.28 | 2.49 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.08 | 5.80 | 260% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.28 | 17.53 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.97 | 1.37 | 2,121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.22 | 31.32 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement