Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSTX vs PCDPX
FCSTX vs PCDPX Comparison
Open Charts FCSTX vs PCDPX
FCSTX vs PCDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSTX vs. PCDPX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSTX is a Hold and PCDPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSTX has more cash in the bank: 662M vs. PCDPX (306M). PCDPX pays higher dividends than FCSTX: PCDPX (2.70) vs FCSTX (2.40). FCSTX was incepted earlier than PCDPX: FCSTX (21 years) vs PCDPX (18 years). PCDPX (0.43) is less costly to investors than FCSTX (0.30). PCDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FCSTX (15.00). FCSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCDPX: FCSTX (0) vs PCDPX (1000000). PCDPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.41 vs. FCSTX (1.25). PCDPX return over 5 years is better than : 7.55 vs. FCSTX (5.24).
| FCSTX | PCDPX | FCSTX / PCDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.43 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.43 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.287 | 0.930 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 662M | 306M | 216% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.40 | 2.70 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.25 | 2.41 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.59 | 10.08 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.24 | 7.55 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.31 | 14.42 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers