Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSTX vs PCDPX
FCSTX vs PCDPX Comparison
Open Charts FCSTX vs PCDPX
FCSTX vs PCDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSTX vs. PCDPX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSTX is a Hold and PCDPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSTX has more cash in the bank: 645M vs. PCDPX (257M). PCDPX pays higher dividends than FCSTX: PCDPX (2.74) vs FCSTX (2.30). FCSTX was incepted earlier than PCDPX: FCSTX (21 years) vs PCDPX (18 years). PCDPX (0.43) is less costly to investors than FCSTX (0.30). PCDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FCSTX (15.00). FCSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCDPX: FCSTX (0) vs PCDPX (1000000). PCDPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.85 vs. FCSTX (3.61). PCDPX return over 5 years is better than : 7.64 vs. FCSTX (5.90).
| FCSTX | PCDPX | FCSTX / PCDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.43 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.43 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.601 | 0.888 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 645M | 257M | 251% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.30 | 2.74 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.61 | 3.85 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.07 | 10.36 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.90 | 7.64 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.02 | 14.62 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers