FCSUF
Price
$0.12
Change
+$0.04 (+50.00%)
Updated
Mar 10 closing price
Capitalization
33.62M
TGMR
Price
$0.24
Change
-$0.05 (-17.24%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
71.92K
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCSUF vs TGMR

Header iconFCSUF vs TGMR Comparison
Open Charts FCSUF vs TGMRBanner chart's image
Focus Minerals
Price$0.12
Change+$0.04 (+50.00%)
Volume$1.65K
Capitalization33.62M
Troy Gold & Mineral
Price$0.24
Change-$0.05 (-17.24%)
Volume$3.33K
Capitalization71.92K
FCSUF vs TGMR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TGMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCSUF vs. TGMR commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSUF is a Hold and TGMR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FCSUF: $0.12 vs. TGMR: $0.24)
Brand notoriety: FCSUF and TGMR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCSUF: 100% vs. TGMR: 149%
Market capitalization -- FCSUF: $33.62M vs. TGMR: $71.92K
FCSUF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $33.62M. TGMR’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $71.92K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCSUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTGMR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCSUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TGMR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TGMR is a better buy in the long-term than FCSUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TGMR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TGMR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

FCSUF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TGMR (@Precious Metals) price change was -17.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.16% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSUF($33.6M) has a higher market cap than TGMR($71.9K). TGMR YTD gains are higher at: 490.571 vs. FCSUF (50.000).
FCSUFTGMRFCSUF / TGMR
Capitalization33.6M71.9K46,732%
EBITDA-5.28MN/A-
Gain YTD50.000490.57110%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue158KN/A-
Total Cash27.3MN/A-
Total Debt20.2MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCSUF vs TGMR: Fundamental Ratings
FCSUF
TGMR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3593
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
94100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4634
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
58100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TGMR's Valuation (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCSUF (61). This means that TGMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCSUF’s over the last 12 months.

TGMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FCSUF (100). This means that TGMR’s stock grew similarly to FCSUF’s over the last 12 months.

FCSUF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as TGMR (100). This means that FCSUF’s stock grew similarly to TGMR’s over the last 12 months.

TGMR's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as FCSUF (46). This means that TGMR’s stock grew similarly to FCSUF’s over the last 12 months.

FCSUF's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGMR (100). This means that FCSUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGMR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCSUFTGMR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
14%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TGMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KOJAF12.30N/A
N/A
Kojamo PLC
MNLXF0.24N/A
N/A
MiniLuxe Holding Corp.
BOLSY7.12-0.15
-2.06%
B3 SA Brasil Bolsa Balcao
KMRPF4.40-0.11
-2.44%
Kenmare Resources Ltd.
SIGL0.17-0.02
-10.53%
Signal Advance, Inc.

FCSUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCSUF and RLYGF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCSUF and RLYGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCSUF
1D Price
Change %
FCSUF100%
N/A
RLYGF - FCSUF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TFPM - FCSUF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
BADEF - FCSUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.76%
TGMR - FCSUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMDRF - FCSUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TGMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGMR has been loosely correlated with PZG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TGMR jumps, then PZG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGMR
1D Price
Change %
TGMR100%
N/A
PZG - TGMR
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
AKEMF - TGMR
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
RVTI - TGMR
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNRIF - TGMR
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RKHNF - TGMR
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More