Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCTFX vs MSODX
FCTFX vs MSODX Comparison
Open Charts FCTFX vs MSODX
FCTFX vs MSODX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCTFX vs. MSODX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCTFX is a Hold and MSODX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCTFX has more cash in the bank: 1.84B vs. MSODX (1.28B). MSODX pays higher dividends than FCTFX: MSODX (3.64) vs FCTFX (3.13). FCTFX was incepted earlier than MSODX: FCTFX (42 years) vs MSODX (7 years). MSODX (0.48) is less costly to investors than FCTFX (0.43). MSODX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FCTFX (19.00). FCTFX (0) and MSODX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MSODX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.20 vs. FCTFX (3.12). FCTFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.45 vs. MSODX (1.08).
| FCTFX | MSODX | FCTFX / MSODX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.48 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.48 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.891 | -0.026 | 3,399% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.84B | 1.28B | 144% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.13 | 3.64 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.12 | 4.20 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.81 | 10.81 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.45 | 1.08 | 228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement