Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCTR vs RECS
FCTR vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FCTR vs RECS
First Trust Lunt US Factor Rotation ETF
Price$34.83
Change+$0.29 (+0.84%)
Volume$97.01K
Net Assets59.25M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$38.19
Change+$0.14 (+0.37%)
Volume$411.03K
Net Assets3.21B
FCTR vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCTR vs. RECS commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCTR is a Buy and RECS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.21B vs. FCTR (59.3M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than FCTR: RECS (10.312) vs FCTR (5.945). FCTR was incepted earlier than RECS: FCTR (7 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FCTR (0.65). FCTR has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| FCTR | RECS | FCTR / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 5.945 | 10.312 | 58% |
| Net Assets | 59.3M | 3.21B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.15 | 433% |
| Turnover | 431.00 | 49.00 | 880% |
| Yield | 0.66 | 0.65 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCTR | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 76% | 19 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCTR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCTR has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCTR jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCTR | 100% | +0.84% | ||
| ETN - FCTR | 78% Closely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| KKR - FCTR | 76% Closely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| APH - FCTR | 76% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| CE - FCTR | 76% Closely correlated | +2.80% | ||
| CZR - FCTR | 75% Closely correlated | -1.04% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +2.33% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.77% | ||
More | ||||