Ad is loading...
FCTR vs RECS
FCTR vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FCTR vs RECS
First Trust Lunt US Factor Rotation ETF
Price$29.69
Change+$0.43 (+1.47%)
Volume$1.95K
Net Assets60.02M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$31.52
Change+$0.52 (+1.68%)
Volume$778.93K
Net Assets2.18B
FCTR vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCTR vs. RECS commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCTR is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.18B vs. FCTR (60M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than FCTR: RECS (-8.954) vs FCTR (-9.784). FCTR was incepted earlier than RECS: FCTR (7 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FCTR (0.65). FCTR has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| FCTR | RECS | FCTR / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -9.784 | -8.954 | 109% |
| Net Assets | 60M | 2.18B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.15 | 433% |
| Turnover | 562.00 | 49.00 | 1,147% |
| Yield | 0.83 | 0.73 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCTR | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 87% | 11 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 77% | 5 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCTR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCTR has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCTR jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCTR | 100% | +1.49% | ||
| ETN - FCTR | 77% Closely correlated | +2.52% | ||
| KKR - FCTR | 76% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| APH - FCTR | 76% Closely correlated | +1.98% | ||
| CE - FCTR | 76% Closely correlated | +2.13% | ||
| CZR - FCTR | 75% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +1.68% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +2.01% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.86% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||