Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCTR vs RECS
FCTR vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FCTR vs RECS
First Trust Lunt US Factor Rotation ETF
Price$32.93
Change-$0.37 (-1.11%)
Volume$530
Net Assets63.36M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.34
Change-$0.46 (-1.28%)
Volume$422.01K
Net Assets2.9B
FCTR vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCTR vs. RECS commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCTR is a Hold and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.9B vs. FCTR (63.4M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than FCTR: RECS (2.080) vs FCTR (0.051). FCTR was incepted earlier than RECS: FCTR (7 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FCTR (0.65). FCTR has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| FCTR | RECS | FCTR / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 0.051 | 2.080 | 2% |
| Net Assets | 63.4M | 2.9B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.15 | 433% |
| Turnover | 431.00 | 49.00 | 880% |
| Yield | 0.77 | 0.69 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCTR | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 1 day ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 24 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCTR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCTR has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCTR jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCTR | 100% | -1.12% | ||
| ETN - FCTR | 79% Closely correlated | -2.02% | ||
| KKR - FCTR | 76% Closely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| APH - FCTR | 76% Closely correlated | -2.23% | ||
| CE - FCTR | 76% Closely correlated | -3.94% | ||
| CZR - FCTR | 75% Closely correlated | -6.41% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -1.28% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.97% | ||
More | ||||