Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCTR vs RECS
FCTR vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FCTR vs RECS
FCTR vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCTR vs. RECS commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCTR is a Hold and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 5.93B vs. FCTR (56.3M). FCTR has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: FCTR (10.279) vs RECS (8.178). FCTR was incepted earlier than RECS: FCTR (8 years) vs RECS (7 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FCTR (0.65). FCTR has a higher turnover RECS (32.00) vs RECS (32.00).
| FCTR | RECS | FCTR / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 10.279 | 8.178 | 126% |
| Net Assets | 56.3M | 5.93B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.15 | 433% |
| Turnover | 371.00 | 32.00 | 1,159% |
| Yield | 0.47 | 0.75 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCTR | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 76% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 75% | 7 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FCTR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCTR has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCTR jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCTR | 100% | -1.98% | ||
| APH - FCTR | 76% Closely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| CE - FCTR | 76% Closely correlated | +2.13% | ||
| CZR - FCTR | 75% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| TROW - FCTR | 73% Closely correlated | -4.13% | ||
| EMN - FCTR | 73% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.59% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
More | ||||