Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCUCX vs RWMFX
FCUCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FCUCX vs RWMFX
FCUCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. FCUCX (393M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FCUCX: RWMFX (1.40) vs FCUCX (0.00). FCUCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FCUCX (3 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). FCUCX (1.85) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FCUCX (15.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCUCX: RWMFX (250) vs FCUCX (1000). FCUCX (8.70) and RWMFX (8.54) have marching annual gain over last year.
| FCUCX | RWMFX | FCUCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.31 | 597% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.31 | 597% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.454 | 2.080 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 393M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.70 | 8.54 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 24.40 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 30.09 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 80.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement