Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCUDX vs RWEBX
FCUDX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts FCUDX vs RWEBX
FCUDX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. FCUDX (393M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than FCUDX: RWEBX (0.75) vs FCUDX (0.50). FCUDX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: FCUDX (3 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FCUDX (0.61). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FCUDX (15.00). FCUDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: FCUDX (0) vs RWEBX (250). FCUDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.07 vs. RWEBX (7.69).
| FCUDX | RWEBX | FCUDX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.06 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.06 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.019 | 1.701 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 393M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.75 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.07 | 7.69 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 23.49 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 26.05 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 73.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement