Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCUDX vs RWMFX
FCUDX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FCUDX vs RWMFX
FCUDX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. FCUDX (393M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FCUDX: RWMFX (1.40) vs FCUDX (0.50). FCUDX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FCUDX (3 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). FCUDX (0.61) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FCUDX (15.00). FCUDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: FCUDX (0) vs RWMFX (250). FCUDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.07 vs. RWMFX (8.54).
| FCUDX | RWMFX | FCUDX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.31 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.31 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.019 | 2.080 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 393M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.40 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.07 | 8.54 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 24.40 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 30.09 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 80.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement