Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCVCX vs SSGSX
FCVCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FCVCX vs SSGSX
FCVCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCVCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCVCX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCVCX has more cash in the bank: 5.47B vs. SSGSX (4.08B). SSGSX pays higher dividends than FCVCX: SSGSX (0.52) vs FCVCX (0.42). FCVCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FCVCX (22 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). FCVCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). FCVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. SSGSX (50.00). FCVCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: FCVCX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.24 vs. FCVCX (-0.41). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : -2.65 vs. FCVCX (-9.98).
| FCVCX | SSGSX | FCVCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.23 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.23 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.499 | 15.305 | 10% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.47B | 4.08B | 134% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.52 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.41 | 10.24 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.94 | 12.08 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.98 | -2.65 | 376% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.00 | 34.94 | 20% |