Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCVCX vs SSGSX
FCVCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FCVCX vs SSGSX
FCVCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCVCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCVCX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCVCX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. SSGSX (4.55B). SSGSX pays higher dividends than FCVCX: SSGSX (0.54) vs FCVCX (0.45). FCVCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FCVCX (22 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). FCVCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). FCVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. SSGSX (50.00). FCVCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: FCVCX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.10 vs. FCVCX (19.48). FCVCX return over 5 years is better than : -4.73 vs. SSGSX (-8.87).
| FCVCX | SSGSX | FCVCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.23 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.23 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.362 | 13.180 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.13B | 4.55B | 113% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.54 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.48 | 21.10 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.16 | 11.30 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.73 | -8.87 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.59 | 38.49 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement