Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCVTX vs SSGSX
FCVTX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FCVTX vs SSGSX
FCVTX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCVTX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCVTX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCVTX has more cash in the bank: 5.47B vs. SSGSX (4.05B). FCVTX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FCVTX (0.57) vs SSGSX (0.52). FCVTX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FCVTX (22 years) vs SSGSX (28 years). FCVTX (1.45) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). FCVTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. SSGSX (54.00). SSGSX initial investment is less costly to investors than FCVTX (4%) vs FCVTX (4%). FCVTX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: FCVTX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.63 vs. FCVTX (1.20). FCVTX return over 5 years is better than : -1.05 vs. SSGSX (-3.07).
| FCVTX | SSGSX | FCVTX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.23 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.23 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.015 | 14.209 | 28% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.47B | 4.05B | 135% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.52 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.20 | 7.63 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.42 | 11.54 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.05 | -3.07 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.70 | 33.46 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement