Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCWGX vs RGGCX
FCWGX vs RGGCX Comparison
Open Charts FCWGX vs RGGCX
FCWGX vs RGGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCWGX vs. RGGCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCWGX is a Buy and RGGCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCWGX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. RGGCX (2.04B). FCWGX pays higher dividends than RGGCX: FCWGX (1.53) vs RGGCX (0.20). FCWGX was incepted earlier than RGGCX: FCWGX (6 years) vs RGGCX (15 years). RGGCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FCWGX (0.51). FCWGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGGCX (34.00). FCWGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGGCX: FCWGX (250) vs RGGCX (2500). RGGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.71 vs. FCWGX (11.82). RGGCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.06 vs. FCWGX (37.38).
| FCWGX | RGGCX | FCWGX / RGGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.60 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.92 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.213 | 11.965 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 2.04B | 7,734% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 0.20 | 758% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.82 | 16.71 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.92 | 65.82 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.38 | 59.06 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 165.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers