Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCWGX vs RSGGX
FCWGX vs RSGGX Comparison
Open Charts FCWGX vs RSGGX
FCWGX vs RSGGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCWGX vs. RSGGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCWGX is a Buy and RSGGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCWGX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. RSGGX (2.04B). FCWGX pays higher dividends than RSGGX: FCWGX (1.53) vs RSGGX (0.63). FCWGX was incepted earlier than RSGGX: FCWGX (6 years) vs RSGGX (15 years). RSGGX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FCWGX (0.51). FCWGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RSGGX (34.00). FCWGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSGGX: FCWGX (250) vs RSGGX (2500). RSGGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.57 vs. FCWGX (11.82). RSGGX return over 5 years is better than : 65.36 vs. FCWGX (37.38).
| FCWGX | RSGGX | FCWGX / RSGGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.85 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.12 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.213 | 12.544 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 2.04B | 7,734% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 0.63 | 241% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.82 | 17.57 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.92 | 69.56 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.38 | 65.36 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 185.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers