Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCWGX vs RSGGX
FCWGX vs RSGGX Comparison
Open Charts FCWGX vs RSGGX
FCWGX vs RSGGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCWGX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RSGGX (1.98B). FCWGX pays higher dividends than RSGGX: FCWGX (1.54) vs RSGGX (0.65). FCWGX was incepted earlier than RSGGX: FCWGX (6 years) vs RSGGX (15 years). RSGGX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FCWGX (0.51). FCWGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RSGGX (34.00). FCWGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSGGX: FCWGX (250) vs RSGGX (2500). RSGGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.06 vs. FCWGX (16.44). RSGGX return over 5 years is better than : 67.12 vs. FCWGX (38.79).
| FCWGX | RSGGX | FCWGX / RSGGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.85 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.12 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.493 | 10.919 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 1.98B | 8,081% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 0.65 | 238% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.44 | 21.06 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.59 | 70.20 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.79 | 67.12 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 186.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement