Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCWGX vs SILLX
FCWGX vs SILLX Comparison
Open Charts FCWGX vs SILLX
FCWGX vs SILLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCWGX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. SILLX (638M). FCWGX pays higher dividends than SILLX: FCWGX (1.53) vs SILLX (0.00). FCWGX was incepted earlier than SILLX: FCWGX (6 years) vs SILLX (26 years). SILLX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FCWGX (0.51). FCWGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. SILLX (31.00). FCWGX has a lower initial minimum investment than SILLX: FCWGX (250) vs SILLX (1000). FCWGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.20 vs. SILLX (20.12). SILLX return over 5 years is better than : 48.78 vs. FCWGX (39.97).
| FCWGX | SILLX | FCWGX / SILLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.96 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.96 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.776 | 9.198 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 638M | 25,078% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.20 | 20.12 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.51 | 69.62 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.97 | 48.78 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 149.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement