Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCWGX vs SMYSX
FCWGX vs SMYSX Comparison
Open Charts FCWGX vs SMYSX
FCWGX vs SMYSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCWGX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. SMYSX (629M). FCWGX pays higher dividends than SMYSX: FCWGX (1.53) vs SMYSX (0.77). FCWGX was incepted earlier than SMYSX: FCWGX (6 years) vs SMYSX (7 years). SMYSX (0.83) is less costly to investors than FCWGX (0.51). FCWGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. SMYSX (31.00). FCWGX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMYSX: FCWGX (250) vs SMYSX (1000000). FCWGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.79 vs. SMYSX (20.55). SMYSX return over 5 years is better than : 55.70 vs. FCWGX (40.10).
| FCWGX | SMYSX | FCWGX / SMYSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.83 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.83 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.767 | 9.836 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152B | 629M | 24,165% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 0.77 | 200% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.79 | 20.55 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.93 | 76.07 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.10 | 55.70 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers