Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCWGX vs TNBAX
FCWGX vs TNBAX Comparison
Open Charts FCWGX vs TNBAX
FCWGX vs TNBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCWGX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. TNBAX (285M). FCWGX pays higher dividends than TNBAX: FCWGX (1.54) vs TNBAX (0.57). FCWGX was incepted earlier than TNBAX: FCWGX (6 years) vs TNBAX (12 years). TNBAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FCWGX (0.51). FCWGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. TNBAX (33.00). FCWGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TNBAX: FCWGX (250) vs TNBAX (1000). FCWGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.34 vs. TNBAX (6.26). FCWGX return over 5 years is better than : 37.61 vs. TNBAX (30.40).
| FCWGX | TNBAX | FCWGX / TNBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.10 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.33 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.760 | 4.969 | 297% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 285M | 55,439% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 0.57 | 271% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.34 | 6.26 | 245% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.59 | 38.54 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.61 | 30.40 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 119.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SIDRX | 15.74 | 0.08 | +0.51% |
| Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val SDR | |||
| FACGX | 188.47 | 0.70 | +0.37% |
| Fidelity Advisor Growth Opps C | |||
| MEFIX | 20.84 | 0.03 | +0.14% |
| ClearBridge Emerging Markets FI | |||
| WBSNX | 32.41 | -0.18 | -0.55% |
| William Blair Small Cap Growth N | |||
| DSMDX | 24.19 | -0.28 | -1.14% |
| Driehaus Small/Mid Cap Growth | |||