Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCWGX vs TNBIX
FCWGX vs TNBIX Comparison
Open Charts FCWGX vs TNBIX
FCWGX vs TNBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCWGX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. TNBIX (277M). FCWGX pays higher dividends than TNBIX: FCWGX (1.53) vs TNBIX (0.79). FCWGX was incepted earlier than TNBIX: FCWGX (6 years) vs TNBIX (12 years). TNBIX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FCWGX (0.51). FCWGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. TNBIX (33.00). FCWGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TNBIX: FCWGX (250) vs TNBIX (1000000). FCWGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.20 vs. TNBIX (8.46). FCWGX return over 5 years is better than : 39.97 vs. TNBIX (33.57).
| FCWGX | TNBIX | FCWGX / TNBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.85 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.08 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.776 | 3.419 | 461% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 277M | 57,762% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 0.79 | 193% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.20 | 8.46 | 263% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.51 | 39.02 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.97 | 33.57 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement