Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCWGX vs TNBRX
FCWGX vs TNBRX Comparison
Open Charts FCWGX vs TNBRX
FCWGX vs TNBRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCWGX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. TNBRX (278M). FCWGX pays higher dividends than TNBRX: FCWGX (1.53) vs TNBRX (0.34). FCWGX was incepted earlier than TNBRX: FCWGX (6 years) vs TNBRX (12 years). TNBRX (1.58) is less costly to investors than FCWGX (0.51). FCWGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. TNBRX (33.00). TNBRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCWGX: TNBRX (0) vs FCWGX (250). FCWGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.37 vs. TNBRX (6.68). FCWGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.16 vs. TNBRX (31.24).
| FCWGX | TNBRX | FCWGX / TNBRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.35 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.58 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.539 | 3.489 | 474% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152B | 278M | 54,676% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 0.34 | 448% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.37 | 6.68 | 350% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.97 | 38.67 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.16 | 31.24 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers