Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDAGX vs RYCPX
FDAGX vs RYCPX Comparison
Open Charts FDAGX vs RYCPX
FDAGX vs RYCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDAGX vs. RYCPX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDAGX is a Buy and RYCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. RYCPX (30.6M). RYCPX pays higher dividends than FDAGX: RYCPX (2.55) vs FDAGX (1.52). FDAGX was incepted earlier than RYCPX: FDAGX (20 years) vs RYCPX (25 years). RYCPX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FDAGX (0.97). FDAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RYCPX (45.00). FDAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCPX: FDAGX (0) vs RYCPX (2500). RYCPX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDAGX: RYCPX (1000) vs FDAGX (500). FDAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.81 vs. RYCPX (-24.12). FDAGX return over 5 years is better than : -0.43 vs. RYCPX (-54.08).
| FDAGX | RYCPX | FDAGX / RYCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 2.38 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 2.43 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.572 | 8.518 | 112% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.22B | 30.6M | 3,997% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 2.55 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.81 | -24.12 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.61 | -40.41 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.43 | -54.08 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.61 | -58.29 | -3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement