Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDAGX vs RYCPX
FDAGX vs RYCPX Comparison
Open Charts FDAGX vs RYCPX
FDAGX vs RYCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDAGX vs. RYCPX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDAGX is a Hold and RYCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. RYCPX (29.9M). RYCPX pays higher dividends than FDAGX: RYCPX (2.60) vs FDAGX (1.56). FDAGX was incepted earlier than RYCPX: FDAGX (19 years) vs RYCPX (25 years). RYCPX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FDAGX (0.97). RYCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FDAGX (52.00). FDAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCPX: FDAGX (0) vs RYCPX (2500). RYCPX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDAGX: RYCPX (1000) vs FDAGX (500). FDAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.21 vs. RYCPX (-28.12). FDAGX return over 5 years is better than : -2.22 vs. RYCPX (-58.09).
| FDAGX | RYCPX | FDAGX / RYCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 2.38 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 2.43 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.189 | 2.280 | 315% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 29.9M | 4,007% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 2.60 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.21 | -28.12 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.01 | -42.18 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.22 | -58.09 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.82 | -59.17 | -3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement