Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDAGX vs RYCPX
FDAGX vs RYCPX Comparison
Open Charts FDAGX vs RYCPX
FDAGX vs RYCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDAGX vs. RYCPX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDAGX is a Buy and RYCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. RYCPX (30.4M). RYCPX pays higher dividends than FDAGX: RYCPX (2.51) vs FDAGX (1.48). FDAGX was incepted earlier than RYCPX: FDAGX (20 years) vs RYCPX (25 years). RYCPX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FDAGX (0.97). FDAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RYCPX (45.00). FDAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCPX: FDAGX (0) vs RYCPX (2500). RYCPX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDAGX: RYCPX (1000) vs FDAGX (500). FDAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.38 vs. RYCPX (-24.55). FDAGX return over 5 years is better than : 3.18 vs. RYCPX (-54.40).
| FDAGX | RYCPX | FDAGX / RYCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 2.38 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 2.43 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.005 | 7.914 | 177% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 30.4M | 4,115% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 2.51 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.38 | -24.55 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.64 | -39.44 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.18 | -54.40 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.74 | -58.47 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement