FDCFF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
8.95M
PRMNF
Price
$2.19
Change
+$0.05 (+2.34%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
363.05M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDCFF vs PRMNF

Header iconFDCFF vs PRMNF Comparison
Open Charts FDCFF vs PRMNFBanner chart's image
Forum Energy Metals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$57.78K
Capitalization8.95M
Prime Mining
Price$2.19
Change+$0.05 (+2.34%)
Volume$8.94K
Capitalization363.05M
FDCFF vs PRMNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FDCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDCFF vs. PRMNF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCFF is a Hold and PRMNF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FDCFF: $0.03 vs. PRMNF: $2.19)
Brand notoriety: FDCFF and PRMNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDCFF: 65% vs. PRMNF: 21%
Market capitalization -- FDCFF: $8.95M vs. PRMNF: $363.05M
FDCFF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $8.95M. PRMNF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $363.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDCFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePRMNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FDCFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PRMNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PRMNF is a better buy in the long-term than FDCFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDCFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRMNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDCFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PRMNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PRMNF is a better buy in the short-term than FDCFF.

Price Growth

FDCFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.14% price change this week, while PRMNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +11.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRMNF($363M) has a higher market cap than FDCFF($8.95M). PRMNF YTD gains are higher at: 121.605 vs. FDCFF (-32.317). FDCFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -12.66M vs. PRMNF (-15.71M). PRMNF has more cash in the bank: 32.7M vs. FDCFF (621K). FDCFF (0) and PRMNF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FDCFFPRMNFFDCFF / PRMNF
Capitalization8.95M363M2%
EBITDA-12.66M-15.71M81%
Gain YTD-32.317121.605-27%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash621K32.7M2%
Total DebtN/A64.7K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDCFF vs PRMNF: Fundamental Ratings
FDCFF
PRMNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2427
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10081
SMR RATING
1..100
10097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6536
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5041

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PRMNF's Valuation (67) in the null industry is in the same range as FDCFF (83). This means that PRMNF’s stock grew similarly to FDCFF’s over the last 12 months.

PRMNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as FDCFF (100). This means that PRMNF’s stock grew similarly to FDCFF’s over the last 12 months.

PRMNF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as FDCFF (100). This means that PRMNF’s stock grew similarly to FDCFF’s over the last 12 months.

PRMNF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as FDCFF (65). This means that PRMNF’s stock grew similarly to FDCFF’s over the last 12 months.

PRMNF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FDCFF (100). This means that PRMNF’s stock grew similarly to FDCFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDCFFPRMNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA350.8412.31
+3.64%
Tesla
GME22.610.24
+1.07%
GameStop Corp
AAPL239.69-0.09
-0.04%
Apple
BTC.X110650.984000-72.617190
-0.07%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY647.24-1.88
-0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF

FDCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FDCFF and LTSRF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FDCFF and LTSRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDCFF
1D Price
Change %
FDCFF100%
N/A
LTSRF - FDCFF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
GSM - FDCFF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.39%
PRMNF - FDCFF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.57%
AAGFF - FDCFF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
BATXF - FDCFF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More