Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDCGX vs FDFAX
FDCGX vs FDFAX Comparison
Open Charts FDCGX vs FDFAX
FDCGX vs FDFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDCGX vs. FDFAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCGX is a Buy and FDFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDCGX (1.22B) and FDFAX (1.22B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FDFAX pays higher dividends than FDCGX: FDFAX (1.79) vs FDCGX (0.83). FDCGX was incepted earlier than FDFAX: FDCGX (20 years) vs FDFAX (41 years). FDCGX (1.72) is less costly to investors than FDFAX (0.68). FDCGX (52.00) and FDFAX (52.00) have comparable annual turnover. FDCGX (0) and FDFAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FDCGX (500) and FDFAX (500) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. FDFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.43 vs. FDCGX (7.23). FDFAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.98 vs. FDCGX (-2.11).
| FDCGX | FDFAX | FDCGX / FDFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.68 | 253% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.68 | 253% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.123 | 11.741 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 500 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 1.22B | 1.22B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.79 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.23 | 8.43 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.28 | 1.40 | -163% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.11 | 3.98 | -53% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.63 | 4.69 | -77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement