Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDCPX vs SLMCX
FDCPX vs SLMCX Comparison
Open Charts FDCPX vs SLMCX
FDCPX vs SLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDCPX vs. SLMCX commentary
Aug 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCPX is a Hold and SLMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 27.5B vs. FDCPX (3.6B). FDCPX pays higher dividends than SLMCX: FDCPX (0.43) vs SLMCX (0.00). FDCPX was incepted earlier than SLMCX: FDCPX (41 years) vs SLMCX (43 years). SLMCX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FDCPX (0.67). FDCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. SLMCX (33.00). FDCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLMCX: FDCPX (0) vs SLMCX (2000). FDCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 86.20 vs. SLMCX (70.02). FDCPX return over 5 years is better than : 87.88 vs. SLMCX (79.04).
| FDCPX | SLMCX | FDCPX / SLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.16 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.16 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 52.727 | 46.248 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.6B | 27.5B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 86.20 | 70.02 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 145.49 | 115.32 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.88 | 79.04 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 195.44 | 287.57 | 68% |