Intraday BUY SELL Signals
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDEM vs VIPS
FDEM vs VIPS Comparison
Open Charts FDEM vs VIPS
Fidelity Emerging Markets Mltfct ETF
Price$30.52
Change+$0.11 (+0.36%)
Volume$39.46K
Net Assets296.89M
Vipshop Holdings
Price$19.64
Change-$0.12 (-0.61%)
Volume$1.6M
Capitalization9.68B
FDEM vs VIPS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDEM vs. VIPS commentary
Nov 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDEM is a StrongBuy and VIPS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VIPS: Fundamental Ratings
VIPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDEM | VIPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 77% | 11 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FDEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDEM has been loosely correlated with ATHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDEM jumps, then ATHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDEM | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| ATHM - FDEM | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| PDD - FDEM | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| VIPS - FDEM | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| QFIN - FDEM | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| MNSO - FDEM | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.58% | ||
More | ||||
VIPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIPS has been loosely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VIPS jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VIPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIPS | 100% | -0.61% | ||
| JD - VIPS | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| PDD - VIPS | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| BABA - VIPS | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| MPNGY - VIPS | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| BABAF - VIPS | 38% Loosely correlated | -5.91% | ||
More | ||||