48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDEM vs VIPS
FDEM vs VIPS Comparison
Open Charts FDEM vs VIPS
Fidelity Emerging Markets Mltfct ETF
Price$27.88
Change+$0.08 (+0.29%)
Volume$35.01K
Net Assets188.16M
Vipshop Holdings
Price$15.12
Change+$0.31 (+2.09%)
Volume$2.01M
Capitalization7.79B
FDEM vs VIPS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDEM vs. VIPS commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDEM is a Buy and VIPS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VIPS: Fundamental Ratings
VIPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDEM | VIPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 5 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 19 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 79% | 15 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDEM has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDEM jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDEM | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| QFIN - FDEM | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| ATHM - FDEM | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| YUMC - FDEM | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.13% | ||
| VIPS - FDEM | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.09% | ||
| OMAB - FDEM | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.19% | ||
More | ||||
VIPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIPS has been loosely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VIPS jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VIPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIPS | 100% | +2.09% | ||
| JD - VIPS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| BABA - VIPS | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| PDD - VIPS | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| MPNGY - VIPS | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| RERE - VIPS | 44% Loosely correlated | +11.50% | ||
More | ||||