84 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDEM vs VIPS
FDEM vs VIPS Comparison
Open Charts FDEM vs VIPS
Fidelity Emerging Markets Mltfct ETF
Price$26.73
Change-$0.04 (-0.15%)
Volume$1.84K
Net Assets171.01M
Vipshop Holdings
Price$14.55
Change+$0.12 (+0.83%)
Volume$17.7K
Capitalization7.39B
FDEM vs VIPS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDEM vs. VIPS commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDEM is a Hold and VIPS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VIPS: Fundamental Ratings
VIPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDEM | VIPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 14 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDEM has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDEM jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDEM | 100% | -0.70% | ||
| QFIN - FDEM | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.25% | ||
| ATHM - FDEM | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| YUMC - FDEM | 33% Poorly correlated | -2.77% | ||
| VIPS - FDEM | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.56% | ||
| OMAB - FDEM | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.72% | ||
More | ||||
VIPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIPS has been loosely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VIPS jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VIPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIPS | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| JD - VIPS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| BABA - VIPS | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| PDD - VIPS | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| MPNGY - VIPS | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| RERE - VIPS | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
More | ||||