57 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
FDEM vs VIPS
FDEM vs VIPS Comparison
Open Charts FDEM vs VIPS
Fidelity Emerging Markets Mltfct ETF
Price$25.76
Change+$0.17 (+0.66%)
Volume$50.2K
CapitalizationN/A
Vipshop Holdings
Price$13.61
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
Volume$963.96K
CapitalizationN/A
FDEM vs VIPS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDEM vs. VIPS commentary
Dec 24, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDEM is a Hold and VIPS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VIPS: Fundamental Ratings
VIPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDEM | VIPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 85% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDEM has been loosely correlated with ATHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDEM jumps, then ATHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDEM | 100% | +0.65% | ||
| ATHM - FDEM | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| YUMC - FDEM | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
| VIPS - FDEM | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.22% | ||
| OMAB - FDEM | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||
| MNSO - FDEM | 25% Poorly correlated | +3.43% | ||
More | ||||
VIPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIPS has been loosely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VIPS jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VIPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIPS | 100% | +0.22% | ||
| BABA - VIPS | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.48% | ||
| JD - VIPS | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.82% | ||
| MPNGY - VIPS | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| PDD - VIPS | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| BABAF - VIPS | 38% Loosely correlated | +14.29% | ||
More | ||||