55 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
FDEM vs VIPS
FDEM vs VIPS Comparison
Open Charts FDEM vs VIPS
Fidelity Emerging Markets Mltfct ETF
Price$26.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$24.5K
CapitalizationN/A
Vipshop Holdings
Price$13.36
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.08M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDEM vs VIPS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
FDEM vs. VIPS commentary
Sep 21, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDEM is a StrongBuy and VIPS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VIPS: Fundamental Ratings
VIPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDEM | VIPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 80% | 16 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDEM has been loosely correlated with ATHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDEM jumps, then ATHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDEM | 100% | +0.41% | ||
| ATHM - FDEM | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| YUMC - FDEM | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.23% | ||
| VIPS - FDEM | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.70% | ||
| OMAB - FDEM | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.37% | ||
| MNSO - FDEM | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.05% | ||
More | ||||
VIPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIPS has been loosely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VIPS jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VIPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIPS | 100% | -0.70% | ||
| BABA - VIPS | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| JD - VIPS | 49% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BZUN - VIPS | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.72% | ||
| SE - VIPS | 36% Loosely correlated | +2.58% | ||
| RERE - VIPS | 35% Loosely correlated | -3.39% | ||
More | ||||