2 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
FDEM vs VIPS
FDEM vs VIPS Comparison
Open Charts FDEM vs VIPS
Fidelity Emerging Markets Mltfct ETF
Price$25.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$45.14K
CapitalizationN/A
Vipshop Holdings
Price$13.97
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.5M
CapitalizationN/A
FDEM vs VIPS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDEM vs. VIPS commentary
Nov 13, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDEM is a Sell and VIPS is a StrongSell.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VIPS: Fundamental Ratings
VIPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDEM | VIPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 14 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDEM has been loosely correlated with ATHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDEM jumps, then ATHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDEM | 100% | -0.61% | ||
| ATHM - FDEM | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| YUMC - FDEM | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| VIPS - FDEM | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OMAB - FDEM | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.08% | ||
| MNSO - FDEM | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.45% | ||
More | ||||
VIPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIPS has been loosely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VIPS jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VIPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIPS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BABA - VIPS | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| JD - VIPS | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| MPNGY - VIPS | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| BZUN - VIPS | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.56% | ||
| PDD - VIPS | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
More | ||||