41 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
FDEM vs VIPS
FDEM vs VIPS Comparison
Open Charts FDEM vs VIPS
Fidelity Emerging Markets Mltfct ETF
Price$25.13
Change-$0.38 (-1.49%)
Volume$49.02K
Net Assets147.7M
Vipshop Holdings
Price$14.83
Change-$0.51 (-3.32%)
Volume$5.81M
Capitalization7.65B
FDEM vs VIPS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDEM vs. VIPS commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDEM is a Hold and VIPS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VIPS: Fundamental Ratings
VIPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDEM | VIPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 85% | 9 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDEM has been loosely correlated with ATHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDEM jumps, then ATHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDEM | 100% | -1.49% | ||
| ATHM - FDEM | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.18% | ||
| YUMC - FDEM | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.22% | ||
| VIPS - FDEM | 29% Poorly correlated | -3.32% | ||
| OMAB - FDEM | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.67% | ||
| MNSO - FDEM | 25% Poorly correlated | -6.23% | ||
More | ||||
VIPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIPS has been loosely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VIPS jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VIPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIPS | 100% | -3.32% | ||
| JD - VIPS | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.90% | ||
| BABA - VIPS | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| PDD - VIPS | 48% Loosely correlated | -4.54% | ||
| DADA - VIPS | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| MPNGY - VIPS | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
More | ||||