20 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
FDEM vs VIPS
FDEM vs VIPS Comparison
Open Charts FDEM vs VIPS
Fidelity Emerging Markets Mltfct ETF
Price$25.57
Change+$0.40 (+1.59%)
Volume$513
Net Assets155.6M
Vipshop Holdings
Price$13.07
Change+$0.14 (+1.08%)
Volume$33.15K
Capitalization6.73B
FDEM vs VIPS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDEM vs. VIPS commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDEM is a StrongBuy and VIPS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VIPS: Fundamental Ratings
VIPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDEM | VIPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 78% | 11 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDEM has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDEM jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDEM | 100% | +2.11% | ||
| QFIN - FDEM | 52% Loosely correlated | +5.35% | ||
| ATHM - FDEM | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| YUMC - FDEM | 33% Poorly correlated | +4.53% | ||
| VIPS - FDEM | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.17% | ||
| OMAB - FDEM | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.99% | ||
More | ||||
VIPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIPS has been loosely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VIPS jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VIPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIPS | 100% | +1.08% | ||
| BABA - VIPS | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| JD - VIPS | 63% Loosely correlated | -3.25% | ||
| PDD - VIPS | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.83% | ||
| MPNGY - VIPS | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.81% | ||
| DADA - VIPS | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
More | ||||