Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDEQX vs RGAGX
FDEQX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FDEQX vs RGAGX
FDEQX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDEQX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDEQX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FDEQX (2.4B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FDEQX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FDEQX (0.00). FDEQX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FDEQX (38 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FDEQX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). FDEQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). FDEQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FDEQX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FDEQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.49 vs. RGAGX (4.75). FDEQX return over 5 years is better than : 37.34 vs. RGAGX (17.74).
| FDEQX | RGAGX | FDEQX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.29 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.29 | 228% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.800 | 7.335 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.4B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.49 | 4.75 | 284% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.02 | 41.00 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.34 | 17.74 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.48 | 106.44 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement