Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDERX vs RMEBX
FDERX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FDERX vs RMEBX
FDERX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDERX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDERX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. FDERX (757M). FDERX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FDERX (1.33) vs RMEBX (0.99). FDERX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FDERX (14 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). FDERX (1.57) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). FDERX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 115.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). FDERX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FDERX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.28 vs. FDERX (-7.32). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.49 vs. FDERX (-11.86).
| FDERX | RMEBX | FDERX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.07 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.07 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.826 | 8.295 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 757M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 0.99 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.32 | 6.28 | -117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.52 | 34.96 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.86 | 34.49 | -34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.27 | 91.75 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement