Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDERX vs RMFCX
FDERX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FDERX vs RMFCX
FDERX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDERX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDERX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. FDERX (757M). FDERX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: FDERX (1.33) vs RMFCX (1.15). FDERX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FDERX (14 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). FDERX (1.57) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). FDERX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 115.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). FDERX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: FDERX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.41 vs. FDERX (-7.32). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.44 vs. FDERX (-11.86).
| FDERX | RMFCX | FDERX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.91 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.91 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.826 | 8.402 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 757M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 1.15 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.32 | 6.41 | -114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.52 | 35.52 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.86 | 35.44 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.27 | 93.54 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement