Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDERX vs RMFCX
FDERX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FDERX vs RMFCX
FDERX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDERX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDERX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FDERX (762M). FDERX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: FDERX (1.25) vs RMFCX (1.16). FDERX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FDERX (14 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). FDERX (1.57) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). FDERX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 115.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). FDERX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: FDERX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.69 vs. FDERX (-5.68). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.08 vs. FDERX (-11.81).
| FDERX | RMFCX | FDERX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.91 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.91 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.595 | 9.325 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 762M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 1.16 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.68 | 7.69 | -74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.32 | 32.42 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.81 | 37.08 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.90 | 91.03 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement