Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDESX vs RGAHX
FDESX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FDESX vs RGAHX
FDESX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDESX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jun 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDESX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. FDESX (4.24B). FDESX pays higher dividends than RGAHX: FDESX (0.45) vs RGAHX (0.39). FDESX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FDESX (56 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). RGAHX (0.44) is less costly to investors than FDESX (0.41). FDESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). FDESX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FDESX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FDESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.27 vs. RGAHX (13.45). RGAHX (23.21) and FDESX (22.35) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FDESX | RGAHX | FDESX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.44 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.44 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 56 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.953 | 9.465 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.24B | 338B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.39 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.27 | 13.45 | 180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.64 | 52.45 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.35 | 23.21 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.63 | 109.54 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement