Ad is loading...
FDEWX vs RFKTX
FDEWX vs RFKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDEWX vs. RFKTX commentary
Jan 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDEWX is a Hold and RFKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFKTX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. FDEWX (14.6B). FDEWX pays higher dividends than RFKTX: FDEWX (1.79) vs RFKTX (1.35). FDEWX was incepted earlier than RFKTX: FDEWX (14 years) vs RFKTX (15 years). FDEWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 11.00 vs. RFKTX (1.00). FDEWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFKTX: FDEWX (0) vs RFKTX (250). FDEWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.80 vs. RFKTX (16.57). FDEWX return over 5 years is better than : 46.79 vs. RFKTX (33.41).
| FDEWX | RFKTX | FDEWX / RFKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.591 | 2.081 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.6B | 24.9B | 59% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.35 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.80 | 16.57 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.23 | 9.45 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.79 | 33.41 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.89 | 79.76 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers