Ad is loading...
FDEWX vs RFKTX
FDEWX vs RFKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDEWX vs. RFKTX commentary
Feb 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDEWX is a Hold and RFKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFKTX has more cash in the bank: 25.3B vs. FDEWX (15.2B). FDEWX pays higher dividends than RFKTX: FDEWX (1.79) vs RFKTX (1.35). FDEWX was incepted earlier than RFKTX: FDEWX (14 years) vs RFKTX (15 years). FDEWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 11.00 vs. RFKTX (1.00). FDEWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFKTX: FDEWX (0) vs RFKTX (250). FDEWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.49 vs. RFKTX (11.70). FDEWX return over 5 years is better than : 50.96 vs. RFKTX (35.41).
| FDEWX | RFKTX | FDEWX / RFKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.884 | 3.367 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2B | 25.3B | 60% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.35 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.49 | 11.70 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.64 | 17.18 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.96 | 35.41 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.34 | 74.63 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers