Ad is loading...
FDFAX vs PGLOX
FDFAX vs PGLOX Comparison
Open Charts FDFAX vs PGLOX
Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Port
Price$87.19
Change+$0.08 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
T. Rowe Price Global Consumer
Price$17.58
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.96M
FDFAX vs PGLOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDFAX vs. PGLOX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDFAX is a Buy and PGLOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDFAX has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. PGLOX (37M). FDFAX pays higher dividends than PGLOX: FDFAX (1.90) vs PGLOX (0.18). FDFAX was incepted earlier than PGLOX: FDFAX (40 years) vs PGLOX (9 years). PGLOX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FDFAX (0.69). FDFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. PGLOX (18.90). FDFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGLOX: FDFAX (0) vs PGLOX (2500). PGLOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.22 vs. FDFAX (-6.24). PGLOX return over 5 years is better than : 36.77 vs. FDFAX (22.44).
| FDFAX | PGLOX | FDFAX / PGLOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.05 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.68 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.432 | 0.688 | -353% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 37M | 3,384% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 0.18 | 1,072% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.24 | 6.22 | -100% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.79 | 37.08 | -8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.44 | 36.77 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers