Ad is loading...
FDFAX vs PGLOX
FDFAX vs PGLOX Comparison
Open Charts FDFAX vs PGLOX
Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Port
Price$88.14
Change+$1.75 (+2.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
T. Rowe Price Global Consumer
Price$16.80
Change+$0.18 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.91M
FDFAX vs PGLOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDFAX vs. PGLOX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDFAX is a Buy and PGLOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDFAX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. PGLOX (34.9M). FDFAX pays higher dividends than PGLOX: FDFAX (2.04) vs PGLOX (0.18). FDFAX was incepted earlier than PGLOX: FDFAX (40 years) vs PGLOX (9 years). PGLOX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FDFAX (0.69). FDFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. PGLOX (18.90). FDFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGLOX: FDFAX (0) vs PGLOX (2500). PGLOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.95 vs. FDFAX (-2.82). PGLOX return over 5 years is better than : 33.14 vs. FDFAX (19.52).
| FDFAX | PGLOX | FDFAX / PGLOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.05 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.68 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.238 | -3.270 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 34.9M | 3,619% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.04 | 0.18 | 1,147% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.82 | 5.95 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.80 | 12.98 | -37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.52 | 33.14 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.83 | N/A | - |