Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDFAX vs RYCAX
FDFAX vs RYCAX Comparison
Open Charts FDFAX vs RYCAX
FDFAX vs RYCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDFAX vs. RYCAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDFAX is a Buy and RYCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDFAX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. RYCAX (31.6M). RYCAX (1.79) and FDFAX (1.73) have matching dividends . FDFAX was incepted earlier than RYCAX: FDFAX (41 years) vs RYCAX (28 years). RYCAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FDFAX (0.68). FDFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RYCAX (45.00). FDFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCAX: FDFAX (0) vs RYCAX (2500). RYCAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDFAX: RYCAX (1000) vs FDFAX (500). FDFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.91 vs. RYCAX (-17.76). FDFAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.54 vs. RYCAX (-42.47).
| FDFAX | RYCAX | FDFAX / RYCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.63 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.68 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.523 | 5.756 | 200% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 31.6M | 3,972% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 1.79 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.91 | -17.76 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.40 | -27.92 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.54 | -42.47 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.18 | -41.99 | -22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement