Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDFAX vs RYCAX
FDFAX vs RYCAX Comparison
Open Charts FDFAX vs RYCAX
FDFAX vs RYCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDFAX vs. RYCAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDFAX is a Buy and RYCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDFAX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. RYCAX (30.5M). RYCAX (1.84) and FDFAX (1.79) have matching dividends . FDFAX was incepted earlier than RYCAX: FDFAX (41 years) vs RYCAX (28 years). RYCAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FDFAX (0.68). FDFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RYCAX (45.00). FDFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCAX: FDFAX (0) vs RYCAX (2500). RYCAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDFAX: RYCAX (1000) vs FDFAX (500). FDFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.43 vs. RYCAX (-16.39). FDFAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.98 vs. RYCAX (-42.14).
| FDFAX | RYCAX | FDFAX / RYCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.64 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.69 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.741 | 8.360 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.22B | 30.5M | 4,010% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.84 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.43 | -16.39 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.40 | -28.75 | -5% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.98 | -42.14 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.69 | -43.83 | -11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers