Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDFAX vs RYCPX
FDFAX vs RYCPX Comparison
Open Charts FDFAX vs RYCPX
FDFAX vs RYCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDFAX vs. RYCPX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDFAX is a Hold and RYCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDFAX has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. RYCPX (29.9M). RYCPX pays higher dividends than FDFAX: RYCPX (2.60) vs FDFAX (1.84). FDFAX was incepted earlier than RYCPX: FDFAX (41 years) vs RYCPX (25 years). RYCPX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FDFAX (0.68). RYCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FDFAX (52.00). FDFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCPX: FDFAX (0) vs RYCPX (2500). RYCPX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDFAX: RYCPX (1000) vs FDFAX (500). FDFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.52 vs. RYCPX (-28.12). FDFAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.57 vs. RYCPX (-58.09).
| FDFAX | RYCPX | FDFAX / RYCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.38 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.43 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.316 | 2.280 | 321% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 29.9M | 4,007% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.84 | 2.60 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.52 | -28.12 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.99 | -42.18 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.57 | -58.09 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.23 | -59.17 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement