Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDFAX vs RYCPX
FDFAX vs RYCPX Comparison
Open Charts FDFAX vs RYCPX
FDFAX vs RYCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDFAX vs. RYCPX commentary
Jul 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDFAX is a Buy and RYCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDFAX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. RYCPX (31M). RYCPX pays higher dividends than FDFAX: RYCPX (2.55) vs FDFAX (1.79). FDFAX was incepted earlier than RYCPX: FDFAX (41 years) vs RYCPX (25 years). RYCPX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FDFAX (0.68). RYCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FDFAX (52.00). FDFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCPX: FDFAX (0) vs RYCPX (2500). RYCPX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDFAX: RYCPX (1000) vs FDFAX (500). FDFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.75 vs. RYCPX (-23.64). FDFAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.29 vs. RYCPX (-53.84).
| FDFAX | RYCPX | FDFAX / RYCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.38 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.43 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.442 | 9.524 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.22B | 31M | 3,945% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 2.55 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.75 | -23.64 | -37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.57 | -39.18 | -7% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.29 | -53.84 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.51 | -57.64 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers