Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDFAX vs RYCPX
FDFAX vs RYCPX Comparison
Open Charts FDFAX vs RYCPX
FDFAX vs RYCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights
Market Cap
The average market capitalization across the group is 642.79M. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 30.38M to 1.26B. FDFAX holds the highest valuation in this group at 1.26B. The lowest valued company is RYCPX at 30.38M.
High and low price notable news
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was 1%, and the average quarterly price growth was 4%. FDFAX experienced the highest price growth at 0%, while RYCPX experienced the biggest fall at 0%.
Volume
The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
FDFAX vs. RYCPX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDFAX is a StrongBuy and RYCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDFAX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. RYCPX (30.4M). RYCPX pays higher dividends than FDFAX: RYCPX (2.50) vs FDFAX (1.73). FDFAX was incepted earlier than RYCPX: FDFAX (41 years) vs RYCPX (25 years). RYCPX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FDFAX (0.68). FDFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RYCPX (45.00). FDFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCPX: FDFAX (0) vs RYCPX (2500). RYCPX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDFAX: RYCPX (1000) vs FDFAX (500). FDFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. RYCPX (-22.13). FDFAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.29 vs. RYCPX (-53.55).
| FDFAX | RYCPX | FDFAX / RYCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.38 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.43 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.061 | 9.373 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 30.4M | 4,128% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 2.50 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | -22.13 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.36 | -37.11 | -12% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.29 | -53.55 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.86 | -57.67 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement