Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDFAX vs RYPDX
FDFAX vs RYPDX Comparison
Open Charts FDFAX vs RYPDX
FDFAX vs RYPDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDFAX vs. RYPDX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDFAX is a Buy and RYPDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDFAX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. RYPDX (31.6M). FDFAX (1.73) and RYPDX (1.67) have matching dividends . FDFAX was incepted earlier than RYPDX: FDFAX (41 years) vs RYPDX (22 years). RYPDX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FDFAX (0.68). FDFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RYPDX (45.00). FDFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYPDX: FDFAX (0) vs RYPDX (2500). RYPDX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDFAX: RYPDX (1000) vs FDFAX (500). FDFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.91 vs. RYPDX (-16.53). FDFAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.54 vs. RYPDX (-40.12).
| FDFAX | RYPDX | FDFAX / RYPDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.64 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.69 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.523 | 5.751 | 200% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 31.6M | 3,972% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 1.67 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.91 | -16.53 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.40 | -25.90 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.54 | -40.12 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.18 | -38.92 | -24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement