Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDFAX vs RYPDX
FDFAX vs RYPDX Comparison
Open Charts FDFAX vs RYPDX
FDFAX vs RYPDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDFAX vs. RYPDX commentary
Jul 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDFAX is a Buy and RYPDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDFAX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. RYPDX (31M). FDFAX pays higher dividends than RYPDX: FDFAX (1.79) vs RYPDX (1.70). FDFAX was incepted earlier than RYPDX: FDFAX (41 years) vs RYPDX (22 years). RYPDX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FDFAX (0.68). RYPDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FDFAX (52.00). FDFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYPDX: FDFAX (0) vs RYPDX (2500). RYPDX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDFAX: RYPDX (1000) vs FDFAX (500). FDFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.75 vs. RYPDX (-15.07). FDFAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.29 vs. RYPDX (-39.15).
| FDFAX | RYPDX | FDFAX / RYPDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.64 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.69 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.442 | 9.937 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.22B | 31M | 3,945% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.70 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.75 | -15.07 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.57 | -26.03 | -10% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.29 | -39.15 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.51 | -39.13 | -19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers