Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDFTX vs NSFGX
FDFTX vs NSFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDFTX vs. NSFGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDFTX is a Hold and NSFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDFTX has more cash in the bank: 52.3B vs. NSFGX (8.55M). NSFGX pays higher dividends than FDFTX: NSFGX (2.09) vs FDFTX (1.83). FDFTX was incepted earlier than NSFGX: FDFTX (9 years) vs NSFGX (8 years). NSFGX (1.30) is less costly to investors than FDFTX (0.34). NSFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FDFTX (7.00). FDFTX (1000000) and NSFGX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FDFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.40 vs. NSFGX (-13.24). FDFTX return over 5 years is better than : 38.22 vs. NSFGX (-2.36).
| FDFTX | NSFGX | FDFTX / NSFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.48 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.30 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.970 | -13.852 | -79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.3B | 8.55M | 611,696% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 2.09 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.40 | -13.24 | -101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.52 | 3.16 | 1,092% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.22 | -2.36 | -1,619% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement