Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDGRX vs GFAFX
FDGRX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FDGRX vs GFAFX
FDGRX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDGRX vs. GFAFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDGRX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FDGRX (97.8B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than FDGRX: GFAFX (0.20) vs FDGRX (0.00). FDGRX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FDGRX (44 years) vs GFAFX (26 years). FDGRX (0.69) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDGRX (16.00). FDGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FDGRX (0) vs GFAFX (250). FDGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.85 vs. GFAFX (0.02). FDGRX return over 5 years is better than : 46.73 vs. GFAFX (13.04).
| FDGRX | GFAFX | FDGRX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.65 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.65 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.874 | 9.043 | 242% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.8B | 353B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.85 | 0.02 | 101,733% |
| Returns for 3 years | 91.33 | 42.74 | 214% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.73 | 13.04 | 358% |
| Returns for 10 years | 323.30 | 106.25 | 304% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers