Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDGRX vs RGAHX
FDGRX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FDGRX vs RGAHX
FDGRX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDGRX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDGRX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FDGRX (97.8B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FDGRX: RGAHX (0.40) vs FDGRX (0.00). FDGRX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FDGRX (44 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). FDGRX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDGRX (16.00). FDGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FDGRX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FDGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.85 vs. RGAHX (0.18). FDGRX return over 5 years is better than : 46.73 vs. RGAHX (13.78).
| FDGRX | RGAHX | FDGRX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.44 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.44 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.874 | 9.200 | 238% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.8B | 353B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.85 | 0.18 | 13,838% |
| Returns for 3 years | 91.33 | 43.47 | 210% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.73 | 13.78 | 339% |
| Returns for 10 years | 323.30 | 106.68 | 303% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement