Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDGRX vs RGEBX
FDGRX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FDGRX vs RGEBX
FDGRX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDGRX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDGRX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FDGRX (97.8B). FDGRX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FDGRX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FDGRX (44 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FDGRX (0.69). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDGRX (16.00). FDGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FDGRX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FDGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.85 vs. RGEBX (-0.77). FDGRX return over 5 years is better than : 46.73 vs. RGEBX (9.71).
| FDGRX | RGEBX | FDGRX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.08 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.08 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.874 | 8.727 | 251% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.8B | 353B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.85 | -0.77 | -3,211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 91.33 | 39.77 | 230% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.73 | 9.71 | 481% |
| Returns for 10 years | 323.30 | 97.58 | 331% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers