Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDGRX vs RGEBX
FDGRX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FDGRX vs RGEBX
FDGRX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDGRX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDGRX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FDGRX (98.8B). FDGRX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FDGRX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FDGRX (44 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FDGRX (0.69). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDGRX (16.00). FDGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FDGRX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FDGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.89 vs. RGEBX (3.42). FDGRX return over 5 years is better than : 54.13 vs. RGEBX (12.32).
| FDGRX | RGEBX | FDGRX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.08 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.08 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.606 | 6.888 | 328% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 98.8B | 357B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.89 | 3.42 | 1,108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.76 | 36.26 | 245% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.13 | 12.32 | 439% |
| Returns for 10 years | 332.18 | 93.96 | 354% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement