Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDKFX vs RERCX
FDKFX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts FDKFX vs RERCX
FDKFX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDKFX vs. RERCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDKFX is a Buy and RERCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FDKFX (597M). FDKFX pays higher dividends than RERCX: FDKFX (2.70) vs RERCX (2.38). FDKFX was incepted earlier than RERCX: FDKFX (7 years) vs RERCX (24 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FDKFX (0.60). FDKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RERCX (50.00). FDKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERCX: FDKFX (0) vs RERCX (250). FDKFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.58 vs. RERCX (3.80). FDKFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.74 vs. RERCX (-6.43).
| FDKFX | RERCX | FDKFX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.12 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.12 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.721 | 6.467 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 597M | 140B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 2.38 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.58 | 3.80 | 436% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.28 | 26.39 | 281% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.74 | -6.43 | -556% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.13 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers