Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDLSX vs FSRPX
FDLSX vs FSRPX Comparison
Open Charts FDLSX vs FSRPX
FDLSX vs FSRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDLSX vs. FSRPX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDLSX is a Buy and FSRPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRPX has more cash in the bank: 2.24B vs. FDLSX (495M). FDLSX pays higher dividends than FSRPX: FDLSX (0.52) vs FSRPX (0.16). FDLSX was incepted earlier than FSRPX: FDLSX (42 years) vs FSRPX (41 years). FDLSX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FSRPX (0.63). FDLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FSRPX (46.00). FDLSX (0) and FSRPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FDLSX (500) and FSRPX (500) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. FSRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.49 vs. FDLSX (-22.53). FDLSX return over 5 years is better than : -10.15 vs. FSRPX (-29.92).
| FDLSX | FSRPX | FDLSX / FSRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.63 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.63 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.453 | -2.958 | 218% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 500 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 495M | 2.24B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.16 | 325% |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.53 | -10.49 | 215% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.01 | -4.45 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.15 | -29.92 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.63 | 60.94 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement