Ad is loading...
FDLSX vs RYLCX
FDLSX vs RYLCX Comparison
Open Charts FDLSX vs RYLCX
Fidelity Select Leisure
Price$18.33
Change+$0.31 (+1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets638.11M
Rydex Leisure C
Price$66.12
Change+$1.01 (+1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.3M
FDLSX vs RYLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDLSX vs. RYLCX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDLSX is a Buy and RYLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDLSX has more cash in the bank: 638M vs. RYLCX (9.3M). RYLCX pays higher dividends than FDLSX: RYLCX (0.59) vs FDLSX (0.51). FDLSX was incepted earlier than RYLCX: FDLSX (41 years) vs RYLCX (24 years). RYLCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FDLSX (0.70). RYLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 214.00 vs. FDLSX (39.00). FDLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLCX: FDLSX (0) vs RYLCX (2500). RYLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDLSX: RYLCX (1000) vs FDLSX (500). RYLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.59 vs. FDLSX (-3.44). FDLSX return over 5 years is better than : 59.11 vs. RYLCX (40.23).
| FDLSX | RYLCX | FDLSX / RYLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.40 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.43 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.269 | -5.883 | 209% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 638M | 9.3M | 6,860% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.59 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.44 | 7.59 | -45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.39 | 13.83 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.11 | 40.23 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.65 | 25.60 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...